Equity and Inclusion in Open Science
How is the value of open science discussed and positioned? Who adopted or contributed to open science practices and how? How has the relationship between research and the public been affected by the opening of research?
While the coronavirus pandemic’s impacts have been largely negative, Covid-19 also served to challenge the way we carry out, communicate, and engage with science. In the first year of the pandemic, more research was shared openly, more preprints were posted, and we saw an explosion in the public communication of science, particularly in mainstream media. These changes have the potential to foster a more open and inclusive approach to research and scholarship and to bolster our capacity to face present and future societal challenges—but only if the changes persist beyond the pandemic.
To better understand the long-term impacts of this shift for a more resilient and informed society, the Value of Openness, Inclusion, Communication, and Engagement for Science in a Post-Pandemic World (VOICES) project seeks to investigate and share new empirical evidence of the value of opening science, to other scholars and to the public, during and beyond the pandemic. VOICES brings together a transnational team of scholars with expertise in open science, scholarly and science communication, and research impact, to understand, document, and measure how the new interplay between researchers, policymakers, science communicators, and the public have affected research, and the role of research in society.
VOICES will examine research questions across and between national contexts, including the four countries represented by the research team (Brazil, Canada, Germany, and the UK). The project is funded by the Trans-Atlantic Platform Recovery, Renewal and Resilience in a Post-Pandemic World (RRR) Award—which includes contributions from Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) in Canada, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) in Brazil, Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) in the UK, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in Germany.
Collaborators
Juan Pablo Alperin (PI), Germana Barata (Co-PI), Isabella Peters (Co-PI), Stephen Pinfield (Co-PI), Alice Fleerackers (Doctoral Student), Natascha Chtena (Postdoctoral Fellow), Monique Oliveira (Postdoctoral Fellow), Isabelle Dorsch (Postdoctoral Fellow), Melanie Benson Marshall (Postdoctoral Fellow)
Related Publications
1298012
voices
items
1
apa
0
date
asc
1
4063
https://www.scholcommlab.ca/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3A%22zotpress-8943773884ea166ee8c025b063a4c9e1%22%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22T7E52G7V%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Fleerackers%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-05-18%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EFleerackers%2C%20A.%2C%20Chtena%2C%20N.%2C%20Pinfield%2C%20S.%2C%20Alperin%2C%20J.%20P.%2C%20Barata%2C%20G.%2C%20Oliveira%2C%20M.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Peters%2C%20I.%20%282023%29.%20Making%20science%20public%3A%20a%20review%20of%20journalists%26%23x2019%3B%20use%20of%20Open%20Science%20research%20%5Bversion%201%3B%20peer%20review%3A%20awaiting%20peer%20review%5D.%20%3Ci%3EF1000Research%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.12688%5C%2Ff1000research.133710.1%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.12688%5C%2Ff1000research.133710.1%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3DD3SMMQGF%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Making%20science%20public%3A%20a%20review%20of%20journalists%5Cu2019%20use%20of%20Open%20Science%20research%20%5Bversion%201%3B%20peer%20review%3A%20awaiting%20peer%20review%5D%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alice%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fleerackers%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Natascha%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Chtena%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Stephen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pinfield%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Juan%20Pablo%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Alperin%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Germana%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Barata%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Monique%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Oliveira%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Peters%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22Science%20journalists%20are%20uniquely%20positioned%20to%20increase%20the%20societal%20impact%20of%20open%20science%20by%20contextualizing%20and%20communicating%20research%20findings%20in%20ways%20that%20highlight%20their%20relevance%20and%20implications%20for%20non-specialist%20audiences.%20Through%20engagement%20with%20and%20coverage%20of%20open%20research%20outputs%2C%20journalists%20can%20help%20align%20the%20ideals%20of%20openness%2C%20transparency%2C%20and%20accountability%20with%20the%20wider%20public%20sphere%20and%20its%20democratic%20potential.%20Yet%2C%20it%20is%20unclear%20to%20what%20degree%20journalists%20use%20open%20research%20outputs%20in%20their%20reporting%2C%20what%20factors%20motivate%20or%20constrain%20this%20use%2C%20and%20how%20the%20recent%20surge%20in%20openly%20available%20research%20seen%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20has%20affected%20the%20relationship%20between%20open%20science%20and%20science%20journalism.%20This%20literature%20review%20thus%20examines%20journalists%5Cu2019%20use%20of%20open%20research%20outputs%2C%20specifically%20open%20access%20publications%20and%20preprints.%20We%20focus%20on%20literature%20published%20from%202018%20onwards%5Cu2014particularly%20literature%20relating%20to%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%5Cu2014but%20also%20include%20seminal%20articles%20outside%20the%20search%20dates.%20We%20find%20that%2C%20despite%20journalists%5Cu2019%20potential%20to%20act%20as%20critical%20brokers%20of%20open%20access%20knowledge%2C%20their%20use%20of%20open%20research%20outputs%20is%20hampered%20by%20an%20overreliance%20on%20traditional%20criteria%20for%20evaluating%20scientific%20quality%3B%20concerns%20about%20the%20trustworthiness%20of%20open%20research%20outputs%3B%20and%20challenges%20using%20and%20verifying%20the%20findings.%20We%20also%20find%20that%2C%20while%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20encouraged%20journalists%20to%20explore%20open%20research%20outputs%20such%20as%20preprints%2C%20the%20extent%20to%20which%20these%20explorations%20will%20become%20established%20journalistic%20practices%20remains%20unclear.%20Furthermore%2C%20we%20note%20that%20current%20research%20is%20overwhelmingly%20authored%20and%20focused%20on%20the%20Global%20North%2C%20and%20the%20United%20States%20specifically.%20Finally%2C%20given%20the%20dearth%20of%20research%20in%20this%20area%2C%20we%20conclude%20with%20recommendations%20for%20future%20research%20that%20attend%20to%20issues%20of%20equity%20and%20diversity%2C%20and%20more%20explicitly%20examine%20the%20intersections%20of%20open%20science%20and%20science%20journalism.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-05-18%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.12688%5C%2Ff1000research.133710.1%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Ff1000research.com%5C%2Farticles%5C%2F12-512%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-06-22T02%3A18%3A55Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22Q6X7V2XE%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Fleerackers%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-06-20%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EFleerackers%2C%20A.%2C%20Chtena%2C%20N.%2C%20Oliveira%2C%20M.%2C%20Dorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20Pinfield%2C%20S.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Alperin%2C%20J.%20P.%20%282023%29.%20%3Ci%3EOpen%20data%20journalism%3A%20A%20narrative%20synthesis%20of%20how%2C%20when%2C%20and%20why%20data%20journalists%20use%20open%20data%20sources%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20SocArXiv.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fwh8jx%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fwh8jx%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3DD5XATTN2%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22preprint%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Open%20data%20journalism%3A%20A%20narrative%20synthesis%20of%20how%2C%20when%2C%20and%20why%20data%20journalists%20use%20open%20data%20sources%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alice%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fleerackers%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Natascha%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Chtena%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Monique%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Oliveira%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Stephen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pinfield%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Juan%20Pablo%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Alperin%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22In%20this%20exploratory%20descriptive%20review%2C%20we%20synthesize%20the%20limited%20body%20of%20literature%20that%20has%20investigated%20whether%2C%20how%2C%20and%20why%20data%20journalists%20engage%20with%20open%20data.%20Fuelled%20by%20the%20open%20science%20movement%2C%20research%20and%20government%20data%20are%20increasingly%20shared%20online.%20While%20data%20journalists%20are%20ideally%20positioned%20to%20turn%20these%20datasets%20into%20compelling%2C%20accessible%2C%20and%20socially%20relevant%20stories%2C%20little%20is%20known%20about%20their%20use%20of%20these%20information%20sources%20and%20how%20this%20might%20affect%20their%20audiences.%20Through%20a%20critical%20reading%20of%20the%20literature%2C%20we%20provide%20an%20overview%20of%20key%20findings%20and%20gaps%2C%20as%20well%20as%20directions%20for%20future%20research.%20Given%20the%20rise%20of%20open%20data%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20and%20the%20role%20data%20journalists%20have%20played%20in%20reporting%20on%20the%20evolving%20crisis%2C%20we%20also%20explore%20differences%20in%20literature%20published%20before%20and%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic.%20We%20find%20that%20theoretically%20grounded%2C%20mixed%20methods%20research%20that%20explicitly%20examines%20data%20journalists%5Cu2019%20use%20of%20open%20data%20is%20sorely%20needed%2C%20especially%20research%20that%20attends%20to%20the%20varied%20forms%20and%20practices%20that%20can%20emerge%20in%20different%20journalistic%20cultures%2C%20media%20market%20structures%2C%20and%20political%20contexts.%20Such%20research%20could%20enable%20scholars%20to%20better%20support%20data%20journalists%20and%20their%20audiences%20in%20taking%20advantage%20of%20open%20data.%22%2C%22genre%22%3A%22%22%2C%22repository%22%3A%22SocArXiv%22%2C%22archiveID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-06-20T18%3A57%3A27.444Z%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fwh8jx%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fpreprints%5C%2Fsocarxiv%5C%2Fwh8jx%5C%2F%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en-us%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-06-22T02%3A18%3A45Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22JNEXSGKK%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Lemke%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-10-27%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3ELemke%2C%20S.%2C%20Dorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Peters%2C%20I.%20%282023%2C%20October%2027%29.%20%3Ci%3EPost-pandemic%20changes%20in%20the%20adoption%20of%20OA%20models%20%26%23x2013%3B%20a%20case%20study%20on%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer%20research%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20METSTI%202023%20Workshop%3A%20Workshop%20on%20Informetric%2C%20Scientometric%2C%20and%20Scientific%20and%20Technical%20Information%20Research%20%28METSTI%202023%29%2C%20London%2C%20UK.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2Fhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10555358%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2Fhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10555358%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3DCFD8XUF4%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22conferencePaper%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Post-pandemic%20changes%20in%20the%20adoption%20of%20OA%20models%20%5Cu2013%20a%20case%20study%20on%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer%20research%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Steffen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lemke%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Peters%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22During%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20many%20publishers%20granted%20free%20access%20to%20research%20publications%2C%20most%20often%20in%20the%20form%5Cu00a0of%20temporary%20Bronze%20open%20access%20%28OA%29.%20It%20remains%20unclear%20how%20stable%20such%20shifts%20in%20adoptions%20of%20certain%20OA%20models%5Cu00a0during%20the%20pandemic%20are%2C%20and%20whether%20they%20apply%20to%20Covid-19-related%20and%20-unrelated%20fields%20to%20varying%20extents.%20We%5Cu00a0compare%20the%20OA%20statuses%20and%20these%20statuses%5Cu2019%20consistency%20across%20two%20Web%20of%20Science%20snapshots%20from%20April%202022%20and%5Cu00a0April%202023%20for%20sets%20of%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer-related%20research%20articles%20that%20were%20published%20in%202020%20and%202021.%20First%5Cu00a0results%20indicate%20noteworthy%20differences%20between%20both%20groups%5Cu2019%20developments%20regarding%20frequent%20OA%20models.%5Cn%5CnACKNOWLEDGMENTSFunded%20by%20the%20Deutsche%20Forschungsgemeinschaft%20%28DFG%2C%20German%20Research%20Foundation%29%2C%20grant%20number%2049551545.%5Cu00a0We%20thank%20the%20German%20Kompetenznetzwerk%20Bibliometrie%20for%20providing%20us%20with%20access%20to%20their%20data%20infrastructure.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-10-27%22%2C%22proceedingsTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22conferenceName%22%3A%22METSTI%202023%20Workshop%3A%20Workshop%20on%20Informetric%2C%20Scientometric%2C%20and%20Scientific%20and%20Technical%20Information%20Research%20%28METSTI%202023%29%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22eng%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10555358%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fzenodo.org%5C%2Frecords%5C%2F10555358%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222024-03-20T15%3A44%3A37Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22LMAMHDTL%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Lemke%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-10-27%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3ELemke%2C%20S.%2C%20Dorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Peters%2C%20I.%20%282023%2C%20October%2027%29.%20%3Ci%3EPost-pandemic%20changes%20in%20the%20adoption%20of%20OA%20models%20-%20a%20case%20study%20on%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer%20research%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20METSTI%202023%20Workshop%2C%20London%2C%20UK.%20https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10561588%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3D7SLFKTVX%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22presentation%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Post-pandemic%20changes%20in%20the%20adoption%20of%20OA%20models%20-%20a%20case%20study%20on%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer%20research%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22presenter%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Steffen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lemke%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22presenter%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22presenter%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Peters%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22During%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20many%20publishers%20granted%20free%20access%20to%20research%20publications%2C%20most%20often%20in%20the%20form%5Cu00a0of%20temporary%20Bronze%20open%20access%20%28OA%29.%20It%20remains%20unclear%20how%20stable%20such%20shifts%20in%20adoptions%20of%20certain%20OA%20models%5Cu00a0during%20the%20pandemic%20are%2C%20and%20whether%20they%20apply%20to%20Covid-19-related%20and%20-unrelated%20fields%20to%20varying%20extents.%20We%5Cu00a0compare%20the%20OA%20statuses%20and%20these%20statuses%5Cu2019%20consistency%20across%20two%20Web%20of%20Science%20snapshots%20from%20April%202022%20and%5Cu00a0April%202023%20for%20sets%20of%20Covid-19%20and%20cancer-related%20research%20articles%20that%20were%20published%20in%202020%20and%202021.%20First%5Cu00a0results%20indicate%20noteworthy%20differences%20between%20both%20groups%5Cu2019%20developments%20regarding%20frequent%20OA%20models.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-10-27%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fzenodo.org%5C%2Frecords%5C%2F10561588%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22eng%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222024-03-20T15%3A46%3A03Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22U5IACAER%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Dorsch%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-11-06%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EDorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20Lemke%2C%20S.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Peters%2C%20I.%20%282023%29.%20Analysis%20of%20%26%23x201C%3Bopen%20access%20publishing%20characteristics%26%23x201D%3B%20for%20COVID-19%20and%20cancer%20publications%20in%20web%20of%20science.%20In%20W.%20Semar%20%28Ed.%29%2C%20%3Ci%3ENachhaltige%20Information%20%26%23x2013%3B%20Information%20f%26%23xFC%3Br%20Nachhaltigkeit.%20Tagungsband%20des%2017%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%20%28pp.%20387%26%23x2013%3B392%29.%20Gl%26%23xFC%3Bckstadt%3A%20Verlag%20Werner%20H%26%23xFC%3Blsbusch.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2Fhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdx.doi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10009338%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2Fhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdx.doi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10009338%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3DVL9MNE59%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22conferencePaper%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Analysis%20of%20%5Cu201copen%20access%20publishing%20characteristics%5Cu201d%20for%20COVID-19%20and%20cancer%20publications%20in%20web%20of%20science%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Wolfgang%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Semar%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Steffen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lemke%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Peters%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22Das%2017.%20Internationale%20Symposium%20f%5Cu00fcr%20Informationswissenschaft%20%28ISI%202023%29%20tr%5Cu00e4gt%20das%20Motto%20%5C%22Nachhaltige%20Information%20%5Cu2014%20Information%20f%5Cu00fcr%20Nachhaltigkeit%5C%22%20und%20basiert%20auf%20den%20Zielen%20der%20Agenda%202030%20der%20Vereinten%20Nationen.%20Die%20Informationswissenschaft%20tr%5Cu00e4gt%20wesentlich%20zur%20Verwirklichung%20dieser%20Agenda-Ziele%20bei.Neue%20Technologien%20wie%20maschinelles%20Lernen%20und%20K%5Cu00fcnstliche%20Intelligenz%20erweitern%20die%20Perspektiven%20der%20Informationswissenschaft%20und%20fordern%20eine%20intensive%20Auseinandersetzung%20mit%20dem%20Thema%20Bewahrung%20und%20Bereitstellung%20von%20Information.Traditionell%20versammelt%20das%20Symposium%20Expertinnen%20und%20Experten%2C%20die%20Forschungsprojekte%20pr%5Cu00e4sentieren%20und%20aktuelle%20Themen%20wissenschaftlich%20diskutieren.%20Das%20diesj%5Cu00e4hrige%20Programm%20umfasst%20Sessions%20zu%20Bildungsmaterialien%2C%20der%20digitalen%20Bibliothek%2C%20zu%20Datenvisualisierung%2C%20Usability%2C%20Forschungsdaten%20und%20anderen%20Themen%2C%20die%20die%20Ziele%20der%20Agenda%202030%20widerspiegeln.Das%20Symposium%20w%5Cu00fcrdigt%20auch%20junge%20Talente%20mit%20dem%20Gerhard-Lustig-Preis%20f%5Cu00fcr%20die%20beste%20Master-Abschlussarbeit%20und%20bietet%20Doktoranden%20ein%20Kolloquium%20zur%20Pr%5Cu00e4sentation%20ihrer%20Forschung.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-11-06%22%2C%22proceedingsTitle%22%3A%22Nachhaltige%20Information%20%5Cu2013%20Information%20f%5Cu00fcr%20Nachhaltigkeit.%20Tagungsband%20des%2017%22%2C%22conferenceName%22%3A%22Internationalen%20Symposium%20f%5Cu00fcr%20Informationswissenschaft%20%28ISI%202023%29%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22EN%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdx.doi.org%5C%2F10.5281%5C%2Fzenodo.10009338%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fzenodo.org%5C%2Frecords%5C%2F10009338%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222024-03-20T15%3A44%3A29Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22DVU9BFZE%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Chtena%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222023-11-14%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EChtena%2C%20N.%2C%20Alperin%2C%20J.%20P.%2C%20Morales%2C%20E.%2C%20Fleerackers%2C%20A.%2C%20Dorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20Pinfield%2C%20S.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Simard%2C%20M.-A.%20%282023%29.%20%3Ci%3EThe%20neglect%20of%20equity%20and%20inclusion%20in%20open%20science%20policies%20of%20Europe%20and%20the%20Americas%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20SciELO%20Preprints.%20https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1590%5C%2FSciELOPreprints.7366%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22report%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22The%20neglect%20of%20equity%20and%20inclusion%20in%20open%20science%20policies%20of%20Europe%20and%20the%20Americas%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Natascha%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Chtena%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Juan%20Pablo%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Alperin%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Esteban%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Morales%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alice%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fleerackers%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Stephen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pinfield%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Marc-Andr%5Cu00e9%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Simard%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22SciELO%20Preprints%20Collection%20is%20an%20integral%20part%20of%20SciELO%2C%20an%20international%20cooperation%20program%20aiming%20at%20the%20development%20of%20open%20access%20scientific%20communication%20covering%20all%20areas%20of%20knowledge.%20It%20operates%20as%20a%20collection%20of%20non-peer-reviewed%20manuscripts%20within%20the%20SciELO%20Network%20of%20national%20and%20thematic%20collection%20of%20journals.%22%2C%22reportNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22reportType%22%3A%22%22%2C%22institution%22%3A%22SciELO%20Preprints%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222023-11-14%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fpreprints.scielo.org%5C%2Findex.php%5C%2Fscielo%5C%2Fpreprint%5C%2Fview%5C%2F7366%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-11-15T00%3A05%3A01Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22VB7NPEYC%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Fleerackers%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222024-01-03%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A2%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EFleerackers%2C%20A.%2C%20Shores%2C%20K.%2C%20Chtena%2C%20N.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Alperin%2C%20J.%20P.%20%282024%29.%20Unreviewed%20science%20in%20the%20news%3A%20The%20evolution%20of%20preprint%20media%20coverage%20from%202014-2021.%20%3Ci%3EQuantitative%20Science%20Studies%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%201%26%23x2013%3B40.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1162%5C%2Fqss_a_00282%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1162%5C%2Fqss_a_00282%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%20%3Ca%20title%3D%27Download%27%20class%3D%27zp-DownloadURL%27%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.scholcommlab.ca%5C%2Fwp-content%5C%2Fplugins%5C%2Fzotpress%5C%2Flib%5C%2Frequest%5C%2Frequest.dl.php%3Fapi_user_id%3D1298012%26amp%3Bdlkey%3D6G2KUV7C%26amp%3Bcontent_type%3Dapplication%5C%2Fpdf%27%3EDownload%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Unreviewed%20science%20in%20the%20news%3A%20The%20evolution%20of%20preprint%20media%20coverage%20from%202014-2021%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alice%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fleerackers%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Kenneth%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Shores%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Natascha%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Chtena%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Juan%20Pablo%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Alperin%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22It%20has%20been%20argued%20that%20preprint%20coverage%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20constituted%20a%20paradigm%20shift%20in%20journalism%20norms%20and%20practices.%20This%20study%20examines%20whether%20and%20in%20what%20ways%20this%20is%20the%20case%20using%20a%20sample%20of%2011%2C538%20preprints%20posted%20on%20four%20preprint%20servers%5Cu2013bioRxiv%2C%20medRxiv%2C%20arXiv%2C%20and%20SSRN%5Cu2013that%20received%20coverage%20in%2094%20English-language%20media%20outlets%20between%202014-2021.%20We%20compared%20mentions%20of%20these%20preprints%20with%20mentions%20of%20a%20comparison%20sample%20of%20397%2C446%20peer%20reviewed%20research%20articles%20indexed%20in%20the%20Web%20of%20Science%20to%20identify%20changes%20in%20the%20share%20of%20media%20coverage%20that%20mentioned%20preprints%20before%20and%20during%20the%20pandemic.%20We%20found%20that%20preprint%20media%20coverage%20increased%20at%20a%20slow%20but%20steady%20rate%20pre-pandemic%2C%20then%20spiked%20dramatically.%20This%20increase%20applied%20only%20to%20COVID-19-related%20preprints%2C%20with%20minimal%20change%20in%20coverage%20of%20preprints%20on%20other%20topics.%20The%20rise%20in%20preprint%20coverage%20was%20most%20pronounced%20among%20health%20and%20medicine-focused%20media%20outlets%2C%20which%20barely%20covered%20preprints%20before%20the%20pandemic%20but%20mentioned%20more%20COVID-19%20preprints%20than%20outlets%20focused%20on%20any%20other%20topic.%20These%20results%20suggest%20that%20the%20growth%20in%20coverage%20of%20preprints%20seen%20during%20the%20pandemic%20may%20imply%20only%20a%20temporary%20shift%20in%20journalistic%20norms%2C%20including%20a%20changing%20outlook%20on%20reporting%20preliminary%2C%20unvetted%20research.https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.webofscience.com%5C%2Fapi%5C%2Fgateway%5C%2Fwos%5C%2Fpeer-review%5C%2F10.1162%5C%2Fqss_a_00282%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222024-01-03%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1162%5C%2Fqss_a_00282%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%222641-3337%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1162%5C%2Fqss_a_00282%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222024-01-15T04%3A15%3A28Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22T7VRXJG2%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1298012%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Marshall%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222024-01-14%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%202%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EMarshall%2C%20M.%20B.%2C%20Pinfield%2C%20S.%2C%20Abbott%2C%20P.%2C%20Cox%2C%20A.%2C%20Alperin%2C%20J.%20P.%2C%20Barata%2C%20G.%2C%20Chtena%2C%20N.%2C%20Dorsch%2C%20I.%2C%20Fleerackers%2C%20A.%2C%20Oliveira%2C%20M.%2C%20%26amp%3B%20Peters%2C%20I.%20%282024%29.%20%3Ci%3EThe%20impact%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20the%20debate%20on%20open%20science%3A%20An%20analysis%20of%20expert%20opinion%3C%5C%2Fi%3E.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fxy874%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fxy874%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22The%20impact%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20the%20debate%20on%20open%20science%3A%20An%20analysis%20of%20expert%20opinion%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Melanie%20Benson%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Marshall%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Stephen%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Pinfield%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Pamela%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Abbott%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Andrew%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Cox%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Juan%20Pablo%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Alperin%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Germana%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Barata%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Natascha%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Chtena%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabelle%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Dorsch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Alice%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fleerackers%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Monique%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Oliveira%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Peters%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22This%20study%20is%20an%20analysis%20of%20the%20international%20debate%20on%20open%20science%20that%20took%20place%20during%20the%20pandemic.%20It%20addresses%20the%20question%2C%20how%20did%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20impact%20the%20debate%20on%20open%20science%3F%20The%20study%20takes%20the%20form%20of%20a%20qualitative%20analysis%20of%20a%20large%20corpus%20of%20key%20articles%2C%20editorials%2C%20blogs%20and%20thought%20pieces%20about%20the%20impact%20of%20COVID%20on%20open%20science%2C%20published%20during%20the%20pandemic%20in%20English%2C%20German%2C%20Portuguese%2C%20and%20Spanish.%20The%20findings%20show%20that%20many%20authors%20believed%20that%20it%20was%20clear%20that%20the%20experience%20of%20the%20pandemic%20had%20illustrated%20or%20strengthened%20the%20case%20for%20open%20science%2C%20with%20language%20such%20as%20a%20%5Cu201cstress%20test%5Cu201d%2C%20%5Cu201ccatalyst%5Cu201d%2C%20%5Cu201crevolution%5Cu201d%20or%20%5Cu201ctipping%20point%5Cu201d%20frequently%20used.%20It%20was%20commonly%20believed%20that%20open%20science%20had%20played%20a%20positive%20role%20in%20the%20response%20to%20the%20pandemic%2C%20creating%20a%20clear%20%5Cu2018line%20of%20sight%5Cu2019%20between%20open%20science%20and%20societal%20benefits.%20Whilst%20the%20arguments%20about%20open%20science%20deployed%20in%20the%20debate%20were%20not%20substantially%20new%2C%20the%20focuses%20of%20debate%20changed%20in%20some%20key%20respects.%20There%20was%20much%20less%20attention%20given%20to%20business%20models%20for%20open%20access%20and%20critical%20perspectives%20on%20open%20science%2C%20but%20open%20data%20sharing%2C%20preprinting%2C%20information%20quality%20and%20misinformation%20became%20most%20prominent%20in%20debates.%20There%20were%20also%20moves%20to%20reframe%20open%20science%20conceptually%2C%20particularly%20in%20connecting%20science%20with%20society%20and%20addressing%20broader%20questions%20of%20equity.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222024-01-14%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en-us%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.31235%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fxy874%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fosf.io%5C%2Fxy874%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222024-01-15T04%3A15%3A42Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Fleerackers, A., Chtena, N., Pinfield, S., Alperin, J. P., Barata, G., Oliveira, M., & Peters, I. (2023). Making science public: a review of journalists’ use of Open Science research [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review].
F1000Research.
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133710.1 Download
Fleerackers, A., Chtena, N., Oliveira, M., Dorsch, I., Pinfield, S., & Alperin, J. P. (2023).
Open data journalism: A narrative synthesis of how, when, and why data journalists use open data sources. SocArXiv.
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wh8jx Download
Lemke, S., Dorsch, I., & Peters, I. (2023, October 27).
Post-pandemic changes in the adoption of OA models – a case study on Covid-19 and cancer research. METSTI 2023 Workshop: Workshop on Informetric, Scientometric, and Scientific and Technical Information Research (METSTI 2023), London, UK.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10555358 Download
Lemke, S., Dorsch, I., & Peters, I. (2023, October 27).
Post-pandemic changes in the adoption of OA models - a case study on Covid-19 and cancer research. METSTI 2023 Workshop, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10561588
Download
Dorsch, I., Lemke, S., & Peters, I. (2023). Analysis of “open access publishing characteristics” for COVID-19 and cancer publications in web of science. In W. Semar (Ed.),
Nachhaltige Information – Information für Nachhaltigkeit. Tagungsband des 17 (pp. 387–392). Glückstadt: Verlag Werner Hülsbusch.
https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10009338 Download
Chtena, N., Alperin, J. P., Morales, E., Fleerackers, A., Dorsch, I., Pinfield, S., & Simard, M.-A. (2023). The neglect of equity and inclusion in open science policies of Europe and the Americas. SciELO Preprints. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7366
Fleerackers, A., Shores, K., Chtena, N., & Alperin, J. P. (2024). Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014-2021.
Quantitative Science Studies, 1–40.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00282 Download
Marshall, M. B., Pinfield, S., Abbott, P., Cox, A., Alperin, J. P., Barata, G., Chtena, N., Dorsch, I., Fleerackers, A., Oliveira, M., & Peters, I. (2024).
The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: An analysis of expert opinion.
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xy874
