RPT – Scholarly Communications Lab | ScholCommLab

visual overview of review, promotion, and tenure project

Rethinking Research Assessment for the Greater Good: Findings from the RPT Project

by Olivia Aguiar

A survey respondent stated that

Not “collegial” enough: New study examines unsaid criteria in the tenure process

by Alice Fleerackers

Juan and Stefanie, scholarly communications lab co-directors, smile for the camera in a sunny backyard

Double tenure: ScholCommLab co-directors celebrate a career milestone together

Six years ago, Juan Pablo Alperin and Stefanie Haustein sat down at a bar in Amsterdam after a…

by Alice Fleerackers

Michelle La, Scholarly Communications Lab research assistant, smiles for the camera

Three questions with…. Michelle!

Our lab is growing! In our Three Questions series, we’re profiling each of our members and the…

by Alice Fleerackers

Juan Pablo Alperin presents at Open Science UN

Policies and Incentives for Open Scholarly Communication

Keynote presented by Juan Pablo Alperin at the first United Nations Open Science Conference on…

by Juan Pablo Alperin

Understanding and Improving Incentives for Open Access

by Juan Pablo Alperin

Would including open scholarship in tenure guidelines move the needle?

by Juan Pablo Alperin

academic institution with text overlay reading publish or perish

Publish or perish? Faculty publishing decisions and the RPT process

By Meredith T. Niles, Lesley Schimanski, Erin McKiernan, and Juan Pablo Alperin – with Alice…

by Alice Fleerackers

Academic review promotion and tenure documents promote a view of open access that is at odds with the wider academic community

by Alice Fleerackers

Public Dimensions of Scholarship

Now Available: Results from the Review, Promotion, and Tenure Study

by Alice Fleerackers